Fill in the form below: the result appears immediately. Names are your own labels, not live values.
Clears the assessment and removes its saved copy from this device.
The comparison uses your squad. It does not show live values or decide fairness for the other squad.
Use one starting squad
Enter the league context once. For each offer, specify outgoing and incoming players and assess the lineup effects. Do not evaluate offer B against a squad that already contains the players from offer A: these are alternatives, not consecutive deals.
Choose your main objective. Are you seeking a better starter, role coverage, less uncertainty, more usable replacements or credit flexibility? A useful comparison makes that criterion visible rather than burying it in an overall score.
Worked case: immediate quality or cover
Fictional example: offer A brings a starting forward and reduces bench depth. Offer B brings midfield cover and leaves the attack unchanged. If your priority is an uncovered midfield role, B serves it better. If you want to strengthen the attack and already have adequate cover, A may be more consistent with your goal.
The result shows both readings and any restrictions. If A leaves a required role uncovered, an improved forward is insufficient to prefer it. Resolve the squad problem first.
How to read a tie
Two offers can have the same effect on your priority while differing in reliability or depth. The comparator reports the tie and secondary differences. It does not invent a winner. Changing your priority should reflect a genuine squad need rather than a wish to obtain a preferred result.
If a dimension remains “Needs checking”, complete that check. Missing information is never converted to zero. A provisional summary is more useful than a ranking based on hidden assumptions.
Frequently asked questions
Can the offers contain different numbers of players?
Yes. Assess the final squad, including empty slots and cover you lose.
Does the comparison determine fairness for the other squad?
No. It uses your squad. Apply the fair-trade method separately to both parties.
Can I assess a single proposal?
Use the evaluator, designed for one assessment.